Factors Affecting Optimal Implementation of Internship in Production-based Training Model in Vocational Schools

Authors

1 T. U

2 university of tabriz- department of psychology & educational sciences

3 T. R. U

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyze suitable methods of vocational internship implementation in production-based training model. Hence, this is an applied research with regard to the goals, and has been quantitative and qualitative in terms of type of data, and is conducted within a research synthesis framework. The data for this study was gathered through documentary study and implementing questionnaires. By analyzing and combining the data the researchers have tried to determine the effective factors in the optimal implementation of internship. The qualitative statistical society includes national and international research in the area of internship available to the researchers. The quantitative statistical society of the implemented questionnaire includes all the students in sewing field in vocational schools. From this population of 1720 students, 314 subjects are selected through Cochran formula and random stratified method. The results indicate that paying adequate attention to “the duration and time”, “location”, and “the quality of internship trainings” is among the effective factors for suitable implementation of internship.

Keywords

References

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered Teacher-student Relationships Are ffective: A Meta Analysis. Review of Educational Research,77(1), pp. 113-143.
Dennen, V. Burner, K. (2008). The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3, pp.425-439.
Hayton,G., Lavender,P.(1992). Workplace Reform and TAFE: Four Case Studies. National Center For Vocational Education Reserch , Leabrook, South Astralia.
King, K. & Palmer, R.(2010). Planning for technical and vocational skills development. Publisher :UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Mfadi, I. H. (2001). A needs assessment of professional competencies of Jordanian vocational secondary teachers, for degree of doctor of philosophy.University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Available at: digitalcommons.unl.edu › DISSERTATIONS › AAI3034385.
Janssen,D.,Pek,K..,& Wilson B.(1999). Learninig With Technology: A costructivist perspective.New Jerssey:Prentice Hall.
Merriam,s. & Caffarella,R.(1999). Learning in Adulthood (2nd Ed).San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
OECD,(2011).Education at a Glance, OECD indicators,OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.autistici.org/magia/sites/default/files/Allegati/OCSE-PISA_2011-00_1.pdf.
Rayfield, J., Skaggs, Ch., & Shafer, J. (2013). Factors that influence student decisions to enroll in a college of agriculture and life sciences. NACTA Journal, 57(1), pp.88-93.
Sharma, L,(2006). Adult Learning Methods. New Delhi; Sarup & Sons.
Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Understanding formative assessment: Insights from learning theory and measurement theory. San Francisco: WestEd.
World Bank (1995).priorties and strategies for Education: a World Bank review. Washington,D.C: World Bank. Available:
at:https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-8213-3311-9.
Yam, S., & Rossini, P. (2012). ‘Online learning and blended learning: Experience from a first-year undergraduate property valuation course’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal,18(2), pp. 129-148.
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Volume 12, Issue 45 - Serial Number 45
September 2017
Pages 29-64

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 February 2017
  • Revise Date: 17 June 2017
  • Accept Date: 17 June 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics